Legal Opinion

Chicago, M. St. P. & Pac. R. v. Goldhammer

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 28, 1935No. 10191PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered after verdict in a suit brought by appellee as plaintiff to recover damages for personal injury.

Plaintiff bases recovery upon a violation by appellant, defendant below, of the Safety Appliance Acts (Act of March 2, 1893, c. 196, 27 Stat. 531; amendatory Act, March 2, 1903, c. 976, 32 Stat. 943; amendatory Act, April 14, 1910, c. 160, 36 Stat. 298, 45 USCA § 1 et seq.).

The facts surrounding the accident are largely undisputed.

Plaintiff, an _ experienced switchman, was at the time of the accident in the employ of defendant in its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. WolfeSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. VoelkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. Chicago Great Western Railroad v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. GoneauSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Swinson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frederick v. GoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Anderson v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. Affolder v. New York, C. & St. LR Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1948
  4. Hendrick v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Peyatte v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API