Hayes v. Hulswit
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*797Weaver, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing her action entered after the court had sustained a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence.
We are mindful of the oft-quoted rule that a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence admits the truth of the opposing party’s evidence, and all inferences that can reasonably be drawn therefrom, and requires that the evidence be interpreted most strongly against the moving party and most favorably for the party against whom the motion is made. Hellriegel v. Tholl, 69 Wn.2d 97, 98, 417 P.2d 362 (1966), and authorities cited.
This is an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pederson v. DumouchelWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Richison v. NunnWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Hellriegel v. ThollWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Versteeg v. MoweryWashington Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by26 opinions
- Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
- Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Miller v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Leonard Harbeson, Jean Harbeson v. Parke Davis, Inc., and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Keogan v. Holy Family HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.