Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Losordo v. Department of Employment Security

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 7, 1982No. 221-81Published

1ConcurrencePeck, J.

It is perhaps unusual for the author of a majority opinion to prepare a concurring opinion as well; it is not, however, precedential by any means.

In this particular case, the majority is unwilling to go beyond the point it considers necessary to dispose of the case. It is justifiably apprehensive that the opinion will assume an advisory character, see Wood v. Wood, 135 Vt. 119, 121, 370 A.2d 191, 192 (1977), going beyond mere dicta, if it is extended.

I do not disagree with this concern. Nevertheless, when additional issues have been raised by the appeal, and briefed and argued as well, I feel…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  2. McKinney v. McKinney KelleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  3. Anthony Adams AIA Architect v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  4. In Re BarcombSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  5. CAPITAL CANDY COMPANY v. SavardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API