Ehlers-Mann & Associates, Inc. v. Madison American Guaranty Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The appellants attack the sufficiency of the credible evidence to support the finding the plaintiff entered into a contract with the management corporation. It is not seriously contended a contract was not entered into on behalf of the defendant insurance corporation. So far as it is material to this appeal, it is sufficient to state the insurance corporation was organized to engage in the business of insurance *15with the authorized capital stock of one million shares of the par value of $1 per share. It was proposed that 650,000 shares of stock would be sold to the public at $1.50 per share…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Laycock v. ParkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Springen v. Ager Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Clancy v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Giffen v. Tigerton Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gauer v. GauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967