Legal Opinion

Markowitz v. Berg

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 25, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

We adopt without reservation the views of the learned vice-chancellor (a) that the mortgage in suit, if made without the knowledge of the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation, contravenes the fundamental policy of the Home Owners’ Loan act (12 U. S. C. A. §!§ 1461 et seq.) and the rules and regulations formulated in pursuance of the authority thereby granted (it seems to be conceded that these rules and regulations have the force of law), and is therefore void, and (b) that such knowledge as Epstein, the “fee attorney,” had of the existence of the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cannon v. BlakeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  2. Cline v. KurzweilNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  3. Kraetsch v. StullSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  4. F.S.T. Corp. v. OnoratoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  5. Franklin Discount Co. v. FordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API