Legal Opinion

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 14, 1969No. C.D. 3924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mat.etz, Judge:

This is an action for refund of customs duties which involves the question as to the proper tariff classification of articles *391invoiced as “Magna-Sigliters” and “Binocular Magnifiers” that were imported from Japan by Fabricon Company of Chicago, Illinois, between January and April 1967, and entered at Chicago by plaintiff, acting as customs broker.

The articles were classified by the government under item 708.85 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States which provides for “Hand magnifiers, magnifying glasses, loupes, thread counters, and similar articles” and were assessed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John H. Faunce, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. QMS, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API