Legal Opinion

McNeil v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 2007No. 04-CF-1233PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Senior Judge:

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of felony murder while armed 1 and other related offenses. In response to evidence that appellant inflicted fatal injuries upon her child, a toddler, appellant asserted the insanity defense. When appellant was arrested shortly after the killing, she chose to remain silent and not answer any questions. During trial, the prosecution presented evidence of appellant’s silence and argued the deliberative nature of appellant’s behavior to rebut her defense of insanity. Given existing judicial precedent on this question, we agree with…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Johnson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. MODERN MANAGEMENT CO. v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State v. BrennauerNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Jennings v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Millard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API