McNeil v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Senior Judge:
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of felony murder while armed 1 and other related offenses. In response to evidence that appellant inflicted fatal injuries upon her child, a toddler, appellant asserted the insanity defense. When appellant was arrested shortly after the killing, she chose to remain silent and not answer any questions. During trial, the prosecution presented evidence of appellant’s silence and argued the deliberative nature of appellant’s behavior to rebut her defense of insanity. Given existing judicial precedent on this question, we agree with…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Johnson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- MODERN MANAGEMENT CO. v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. BrennauerNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Jennings v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Millard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.