Legal Opinion

In re City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by The City of New York and by Frank Andre and others, the property owners, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 13th day of March, 1912. Also an appeal by Theodore W. Stemmier from so much of said order as overrules his preliminary objections.

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J.:

This is an appeal by the city of New York and by certain property owners liable for assessment in proceedings to open Titus street in that part of the city of New York formerly known as Long Island City, from an order denying a motion to vacate the order confirming the report of the commissioners of estimate and assessment appointed in such proceeding, and also an order appointing a referee to take proof of the facts and circumstances relating to the ownership of an award made in such proceeding to the unknown owner of a lot shown on the damage map, known as lot No. 4. Theodore W.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. In re the Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Matter of HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Lewiston v. BrintonIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  2. In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  4. In re Harmon & Himrod StreetsNew York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API