City of Lewiston v. Brinton
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
— Respondent, City of Lewiston, instituted this action to procure by eminent domain a permanent way for a public alley over and across a parcel of land belonging to appellant, Caleb Brinton, the only party defendant. Appellant demurred on the grounds that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and that it showed upon its face a defect of parties defendant, because the complaint alleged that certain parties named therein held easements over the strip sought, which demurrer was overruled and the appellant answered, denying the right of the city to condemn;…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- In Re Vil. of Olean v. . SteynerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Bartlett v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1878
- Reynolds v. LincolnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Suchan v. RutherfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Canyon View Irrigation Co. v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Lewis Clark County v. NettMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Seaboard Corp. v. Marsh Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- City of Bellevue v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.