Legal Opinion

Michael Megginson v. City of New York; Joshua Wigfall, individually; Curtis Tucker, individually; Roger Berrios, individually; Freddie Larry, individually; Durrell Wilson, individually; Keron Guy, individually; Jamal Dart, individually; “Jane” Phillips; and John & Jane Does 1 through 10, individually

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 25, 2026No. 1:24-cv-00115Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL MEGGINSON, Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM & ORDER CITY OF NEW YORK; JOSHUA 24-CV-115 (NRM) (MMH) WIGFALL, individually; CURTIS TUCKER, individually; ROGER BERRIOS, individually; FREDDIE LARRY, individually; DURRELL WILSON, individually; KERON GUY, individually; JAMAL DART, individually; “JANE” PHILLIPS; and JOHN & JANE DOES 1 through 10, individually, Defendants. NINA R. MORRISON, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Michael Megginson, by counsel, sues the City of New York and named and unnamed individual New York City Department…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Scotto v. AlmenasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Mangini v. McClurgNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API