Legal Opinion

Barnett v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 14, 2005No. 22A05-0506-CR-331PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-defendant Herschel A. Barnett appeals his conviction for Receiving Stolen Property, 1 a class D felony, and being a Habitual Offender. 2 Specifically, Barnett contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction. The State also cross-appeals, arguing that Barnett's sentence was illegal. Finding that the evidence was sufficient and that the trial court incorrectly sentenced Barnett, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with instructions to correct the sentencing order.

FACTS

At approximately noon on July 830, 2004, Douglas Gentry left his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McHenry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Hendrix v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Purifoy v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Brabandt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Boggs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Fortson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. S.G. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Hardley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API