Legal Opinion

Hardley v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 2009No. 49S05-0905-CR-209PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

To address conflicting opinions from the Court of Appeals and to consider the import of recent decisions of this Court, we grant transfer and hold that the State may challenge the legality of a erimi-nal sentence by appeal without first filing a motion to correct erroneous sentence, and that such appeal need not be commenced within thirty days of the sentencing judgment.

The defendant was convicted and sentenced for three criminal offenses 1: class D felony Theft,2 class D felony Criminal Confinement,3 and class A misdemeanor Battery.4 His appeal presented claims of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Barany v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Stephens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Niece v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Abron v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cornelius Hines v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Treadway v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. BrunnerIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Richardson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State of Indiana v. Christopher HollowayIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API