Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel McNutt v. Orcutt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1936No. 26,460Published

1Dissent

On Petition for Rehearing Dissenting Opinion

Treanor, J.,

Dissenting. — I respectfully dissent from the action of the court in overruling appellees’ petition for rehearing.

The plaintiff in the condemnation proceeding was the State of Indiana on the relation of the Department of Public Works of the State of Indiana. The Board of Public Works by resolution had declared that it was necessary for the State of Indiana to acquire the “rights, title and interest” of Minnie P. Orcutt in and to the real estate in question for state forestry purposes and for other uses connected therewith. The complaint…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Proprietors of Locks & Canals on Merrimack River v. Nashua & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GeiselIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Collins v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1842

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API