Bauer v. Morgan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
From a denial of unemployment compensation benefits, claimant appeals. Claimant assigns as error two findings of fact by the Appeals Board and its conclusion of law that he was discharged for misconduct connected with his work. ①
Claimant worked at the Salem plant of the Overhead Door Company from September 1972 until January 30, 1973, when he was discharged. The Appeals Board made the following findings of fact:
“FINDINGS OF FACT: (1) The claimant worked for the above-named employer from September 1972 until January 30, 1973. (2) His work was that of a ‘spring winder.’ (3) He worked a regular…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Steele v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Romanosky v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Stromberg v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Margolin v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Bauer v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.