Legal Opinion

Stromberg v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 17, 1976No. 75-AB-1022, CA 5567PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

The Employment Appeals Board denied claimant’s claim for unemployment compensation benefits after concluding that he was discharged for misconduct connected with his work. ORS 657.176(2)(a). 1 Claimant contends that his actions did not constitute misconduct.

Claimant was a clerk for a retail store. Three or four times during the period of his employment claimant had been asked to work overtime and had refused. Toward the end of his shift on August 16,1975, he was again asked by his supervisor to work overtime. Claimant responded by shaking his head in a negative manner. Claimant’s supervisor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Romanosky v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Bauer v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Margolin v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Prassis v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API