Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Briel Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 26, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, Commissioner.

The claim of Charles S. Parrish for workmen’s compensation for injuries sustained in an accident in his employment was dismissed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board for the reason that the •claim was not filed within one year after the cessation of voluntary payments, as is required by KRS 342.270(1). On appeal to the circuit court judgment was entered affirming the order of dismissal. We have Parrish’s appeal from that judgment.

Appellant’s contention is that his claim ■should not be barred by limitations because, by the words and actions of his employer and the latter’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cambron v. Co-Operative Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
  2. Kentucky West Virginia Gas Co. v. SpurlockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hitachi Automotive Products USA, Inc. v. CraigKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Logan Manufacturing Co. v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972
  3. Franklin v. Blue Grass Cooperage Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
  4. Emmert v. Jefferson County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API