Legal Opinion

Clark v. Mazda Motor Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 4, 2003No. 97,514PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.

T1 The instant matter involves a question certified by the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma in a manufacturers' products liability case. We are asked to answer the question of whether *20847 O.S.2001, § 12-4201 of the Oklahoma Mandatory Seat Belt Act, 47 O.S.2001, § 12-416 et seq., as interpreted in Bishop v. Takata Corp., 2000 OK 71, 12 P.3d 459, bars the admission of evidence of seat belt use or non-use, in a manufacturer's products liability crashworthiness case2. The question is answered as follows: Section 12-420 does not bar the admission of evidence of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Lee v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Bishop v. Takata Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sims v. Great American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Stokes v. Montana Thirteenth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft v. RothNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Braswell v. Cincinnati IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  5. Moody v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API