Clark v. Mazda Motor Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.
T1 The instant matter involves a question certified by the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma in a manufacturers' products liability case. We are asked to answer the question of whether *20847 O.S.2001, § 12-4201 of the Oklahoma Mandatory Seat Belt Act, 47 O.S.2001, § 12-416 et seq., as interpreted in Bishop v. Takata Corp., 2000 OK 71, 12 P.3d 459, bars the admission of evidence of seat belt use or non-use, in a manufacturer's products liability crashworthiness case2. The question is answered as follows: Section 12-420 does not bar the admission of evidence of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Lee v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Bishop v. Takata Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sims v. Great American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Stokes v. Montana Thirteenth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft v. RothNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Braswell v. Cincinnati IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Moody v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.