Legal Opinion

Wendell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1929No. 2881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

Samuel Wendell, Royal Leikin, and Moe Lieberman, hereinafter referred to as defendants, were convicted in the court below of violation of section 4 of the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act of October 29. 1919, 41 Stat. 324 (18 USCA § 408), and, from sentence thereon, they have appealed to this court.- The only question raised by their appeal which merits discussion is one as to the sufficiency of the indictment.

The indictment charges that the defendants did “feloniously receive and conceal” a certain Buick automobile, “moving as, and which is a part of, and which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Goldberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  4. Martin v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  5. Jolly v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robertson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  2. United States v. AustrewDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1961
  3. United States v. J. Tirocchi & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1960
  4. Grimsley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  5. Grimsley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API