Legal Opinion

Martin v. States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 19, 1924No. 2213PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Circuit Judge.

Martin and Allwood, the plaintiffs hi ■error, were defendants below, and will be so styled here. In the Dis* trict Court a one-count indictment was returned against them and two other men, by name Ratliff and Patterson, respectively. The .indict-, ment in apt words charged them with conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States; that is to say:

“To unlawfully, willfully aud knowingly violate the Act of Congress of October 2S, 1919, particularly title 2 thereof, the short title of which act of Congress is the National Prohibition Act and which act of Congress is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rudner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  2. Violette v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. CobbCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Earl MisslerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  3. Feinberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  5. Hopper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API