Martin v. States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Circuit Judge.
Martin and Allwood, the plaintiffs hi ■error, were defendants below, and will be so styled here. In the Dis* trict Court a one-count indictment was returned against them and two other men, by name Ratliff and Patterson, respectively. The .indict-, ment in apt words charged them with conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States; that is to say:
“To unlawfully, willfully aud knowingly violate the Act of Congress of October 2S, 1919, particularly title 2 thereof, the short title of which act of Congress is the National Prohibition Act and which act of Congress is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rudner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Violette v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. CobbCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Earl MisslerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Feinberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Hopper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.