Legal Opinion

Holland v. BUREAU OF COLLECTION RECOVERY

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided August 2, 2011No. Case 8:10-cv-2632-T-26TGWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RICHARD A. LAZZARA, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment with supporting memorandum of law (Dkt. 15) and statement of undisputed facts with exhibits (Dkt. 17). Plaintiff filed a memorandum in opposition with exhibits (Dkt. 29) and a statement of disputed facts (Dkt. 30).

Plaintiff, Susan Holland, filed this cause of action against Defendant, Bureau of Collection Recovery, pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (“the FDCPA”). She asserts that she is a “consumer” as the term is defined…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Stephen P. Turner v. J.V.D.B. & Associates, Inc., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Diane Jeter v. Credit Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Akalwadi v. Risk Management Alternatives, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rush v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
  2. Hart v. Credit Control, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API