Legal Opinion

Young v. Droz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1905No. 5427PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Stevens county, Richardson, J., entered June 20, 1904, in favor of the defendants, dismissing on the merits an action to quiet title, after a trial before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

On the 3d of October, 1901, the county of Stevens brought an action to foreclose a certificate of delinquency, held hy it for delinquent taxes. The title of the case was “Stevens County v. H. Kahlen and 103 others.” The summons was in the following language, to wit:

“You are. hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service, and defend this action or pay the amount due against your property, together with the costs; and in case of your failure to do so judgment will be rendered foreclosing the lien for said certificate of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Woodham v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Sturgiss v. DartWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Dolan v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. McManus v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Elliott v. ClementOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Wick v. ReaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Owen v. OwenWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Moller v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Thompson v. SchonerWashington Supreme Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API