Legal Opinion

Dent v. Lotto Sport Italia S.p.A.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 11, 2020No. 2:17-cv-00651Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 David Dent, No. CV-17-00651-PHX-DMF 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 Lotto Sport Italia SpA, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Plaintiff filed his Complaint on March 3, 2017. (Doc. 1)1 Count One requests a 17 finding that Plaintiff’s registration and/or use of domain names <lottostore.com> and 18 <lottoworks.com> is not unlawful pursuant to a claim of reverse domain name hijacking 19 under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (“ACPA”) provisions of the 20 Lanham Act in

15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(2)(D)(v)2. (Id. at 9-10)…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API