Legal Opinion

Hemphill County v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1967No. 7613PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAPMAN, Justice.

The Supreme Court of Texas in a Per Curiam opinion1 properly reversed this court wherein we affirmed the trial court. The latter court overruled the motion for summary judgment of appellant, Hemphill County, and appellee, Lawyers Surety Corporation. Then after a day and a half of testimony before a jury, dismissed the jury and held the case of plaintiff, Hemphill County, was barred under the two-year statute of limitation.

The action filed by the county attorney of Hemphill County was for conversion of personal property but “Title 91-Limitations * * * 1. Limitations of Actions…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terrell v. GreeneTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Looscan v. County of HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Edmondson v. CumingsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Hemphill County v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Harwell v. Ward CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. Harris County Commissioners CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Driscoll v. Harris County Commissioners CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API