Legal Opinion

Hemphill County v. Adams

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1966No. A-11722PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The court of civil appeals has held that Hemphill County’s cause of action for damages for conversion of county property, asserted in a suit against the sheriff and a former sheriff of the county and their bondsman, can be barred by a statute of limitation and is barred by the two-year statute. 406 S.W.2d 267. The primary holding is in conflict with our opinions in Brazos River Authority v. City of Graham, 163 Tex. 167, 354 S.W.2d 99 (1961) and City of Port Arthur v. Tillman, Tex.Civ.App., 398 S.W.2d 750 (1965) in which we held that by virtue of the provisions of Article 5517, Vernon’s Texas…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brazos River Authority v. City of GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. City of Port Arthur v. TillmanTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Hemphill County v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Deckard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Hemphill County v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1981
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1982
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API