Legal Opinion

Francisco Mendoza Ordonez v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 24, 1979No. 78-2541PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the denial of motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

We find no error in the district court’s denial of appellant’s allegation of trial court errors. As to his allegation of insufficiency of evidence to convict him, the issue was decided adversely to appellant on direct appeal and need not be considered again.

However, appellant’s retained counsel failed to file a petition for certiorari after we affirmed his conviction on direct appeal, 525 F.2d 1406 (5 Cir. 1975), despite counsel’s acknowledgment that he failed to file the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Joseph Michael Lacaze, and Douglas Arceneaux v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Terry Eugene Savage v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. William Barton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Russell Hobson, Russell Hobson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Alexander v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
  4. Kincade v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API