Feeney v. Spalding
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On Motion by Defendant. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtWisavell, J.
The defendant is a physician and oculist practicing in Portland. In' the summer of 1891, while on a trip to Machias, to visit patients, he stopped over for a short time at Cherryfield. While he was there, the plaintiff, at that time a girl *112seven years old, who had been cross-eyed in one eye since she was a year and a half old, was taken to the defendant by her father for examination and operation if thought desirable.
After an examination by the defendant he performed the usual operation for a difficulty of this kind, bandaged the child’s eye, gave certain directions to the father and…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Hunter v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Slimak v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Downer v. VeilleuxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Kernodle v. ElderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Wilkins' Admr. v. BrockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.