Legal Opinion

Feeney v. Spalding

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 8, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On Motion by Defendant. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWisavell, J.

The defendant is a physician and oculist practicing in Portland. In' the summer of 1891, while on a trip to Machias, to visit patients, he stopped over for a short time at Cherryfield. While he was there, the plaintiff, at that time a girl *112seven years old, who had been cross-eyed in one eye since she was a year and a half old, was taken to the defendant by her father for examination and operation if thought desirable.

After an examination by the defendant he performed the usual operation for a difficulty of this kind, bandaged the child’s eye, gave certain directions to the father and…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hunter v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  2. Slimak v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Downer v. VeilleuxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  4. Kernodle v. ElderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Wilkins' Admr. v. BrockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API