Clark v. Duval Corporation
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
The appeal in this workman’s compensation case involves notice under § 59-10 — 13.-4, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 9, pt. 1). Plaintiff suffered an injury in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. There is no question as to the employer’s knowledge of the accident and of a “no lost time” injury where medical attention was provided by the employer. Our concern is with the employer’s knowledge of a “compensable” injury. See Smith v. State, 79 N.M. 25, 439 P.2d 242 (Ct.App.1968). Compare Rohrer v. Eidal International, 79 N.M. 711, 449 P.2d 81 (Ct.App.1968).…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Martinez v. Research Park, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Lozano v. ArcherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Geeslin v. Goodno, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Waymire v. Signal Oil Field Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Pankey v. Hot Springs Nat. BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vaughn v. United Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Beckwith v. Cactus Drilling CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Martinez v. City of ClovisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Nunez v. Smith's Management Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Richardson Ford Sales, Inc. v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.