Legal Opinion

Chastain v. Pender

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 2, 1915No. 5631PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Swperior Court, Tulsa County; M. A., Breckenridge, Judge. Action by Beulah Pender and others against Edward Chastain and another. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MATHEWS, C.

The parties will be designated here as in the court below. On January 11, 1910, the plaintiff, Beulah Pender, filed an action in ejectment against Edward Chastain, Nevada Chastain, Nick Eaton, Leonora Eaton, and Chester Eaton, a minor, seeking to obtain possession of certain realty. It appears from the record, as disclosed by the pleadings, that on March 3, 1907, Sarah J. Eaton died, seised of the realty in controversy. On December 16, 1908, one S. G. Pen-der, the husband of Beulah Pender, was appointed administrator of the estate, and on the 3d day of J^une, 1909, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tyler v. SanbornIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Frazier v. JeakinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Burton v. ComptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Bank of Wetumpka v. WalkleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. MulvihillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Culbertson v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Bopst v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Vaughn v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Baker v. FinnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API