Legal Opinion

Frady v. Georgia Farmers Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 21, 1934No. 23455Published

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Notwithstanding a petition may fail to set out a cause of action and therefore may not be good as against a general demurrer, in that certain allegations as to facts which are essential to the plaintiff’s right to recover are omitted from the petition, it is amendable where it shows a plaintiff and a defendant and contains allegation's “sufficient to indicate and specify some particular fact or transaction as a cause of action.” Civil Code (1910), § 5682. Where the petition in a suit to recover for loss under a fire-insurance policy contains no allegation that the plaintiff had ever been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Georgia Farmers Fire Insurance v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API