Legal Opinion
Georgia Farmers Fire Insurance v. Tanner
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 15, 1926No. 16424PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. Assuming that the petition in a suit by the insured to recover under a fire-insurance policy fails to allege facts sufficient to show a cause of action, in that it fails to contain any allegation showing that the insured had any insurable interest in the property, such omission may be supplied by amendment. Civil Code (1910), § 5682; German-American Ins. Co. v. Davidson, 67 Ga. 11; Ellison v. Georgia R. Co., 87 Ga. 691 (13 S. E. 809); City of Columbus v. Anglin, 120 Ga. 785 (48 S. E. 318) ; Dunn v. Freeman, 24 Ga. App. 504 (101 S. E. 393) ; Davis v. Carroll, 30 Ga. App. 719 (119 S. E.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Bedell & BowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Northwestern National Insurance v. Southern States Phosphate & Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Dunn v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Interstate Life & Accident Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Frady v. Georgia Farmers Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934