State v. Greiff
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentJohnson, J.
(dissenting) — The Rules of Criminal Procedure impose a continuing duty to disclose discoverable information. I agree with the majority that the prosecutor violated this duty when he failed to inform defense counsel prior to retrial that the investigating police officer was substantially changing his previous trial testimony. I disagree with the majority that, under the facts of this case, the trial court’s decision to deny the motion for a mistrial was discretionary and no abuse occurred.
As a direct consequence of the prosecutor’s failure to disclose this material change in testimony,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. James Ray McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Daniel L. Bruno v. Ruth L. Rushen, Director, California Department of Corrections, and Paul J. Morris, Warden, California State Prison at FolsomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- State v. CaldwellWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. MoneymakerWashington Supreme Court · 1918