State v. Caldwell
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, C.J.
The sole issue in this case is whether a jury instruction stating "the law presumes that every man intends the natural and probable consequences of his own acts" violated due process requirements for use of presumptions in criminal cases. We hold that the instruction violated the due process guaranties of the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution and article 1, section 3 of the Washington Constitution. The conviction of first degree assault is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.
On the evening of August 11, 1977, John Parmon and Rudy Perez became associated with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. GolladayWashington Supreme Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. WaldenWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. WaldenWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re the Personal Restraint of HaglerWashington Supreme Court · 1982
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.