Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Standford v. Davidson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1962No. 39379Published

1ConcurrenceHall, Judge

While I concur in the judgment and agree in substance with the above opinion, I feel compelled to set out my personal views as to the use of the word “jurisdiction.” In my opinion the term has been used far too loosely in many reported opinions and as a result has produced no small degree of equivocality.

“Jurisdiction of the subject-matter is the power to- deal with the general abstract question, to hear the particular facts in any *744case relating to this question, and to determine whether or not they are sufficient to invoke the exercise of that power.’.’ Melton v. Jenkins, 50 Ga. App. 615 (1)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zeagler v. ZeaglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. SuddethSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Arnold v. ChuppCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. Robinson v. Attapulgus Clay Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. GambleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API