Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Chupp

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1956No. 36110PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

In special ground 6 it is contended that the trial court gave the plaintiff the benefit of a contention not pleaded or pressed by him. The court charged certain statutes, prefacing this portion of his instructions by the statement: “Among the acts of negligence charged by the plaintiff in his petition are certain acts which he charges were a violation of the laws of Georgia.” The court then charged statute law relating to two charges of negligence per se on the part of the defendants. He then charged: "Then there was in effect at the time and place of the occurrence set out and described and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Epps & Leabow v. BuckmasterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Shirley Cloak & Dress Co. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Mayfield v. Savannah, Griffin & North Alabama RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  4. Ergle v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. National Service Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Evershine Products, Inc. v. SchmittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Key v. HamiltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Standford v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Moody v. Southland Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API