Arnold v. Chupp
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
In special ground 6 it is contended that the trial court gave the plaintiff the benefit of a contention not pleaded or pressed by him. The court charged certain statutes, prefacing this portion of his instructions by the statement: “Among the acts of negligence charged by the plaintiff in his petition are certain acts which he charges were a violation of the laws of Georgia.” The court then charged statute law relating to two charges of negligence per se on the part of the defendants. He then charged: "Then there was in effect at the time and place of the occurrence set out and described and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Epps & Leabow v. BuckmasterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Shirley Cloak & Dress Co. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Mayfield v. Savannah, Griffin & North Alabama RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Ergle v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cunningham v. National Service Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Evershine Products, Inc. v. SchmittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Key v. HamiltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Standford v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Moody v. Southland Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.