Legal Opinion
United States v. Cheryl E. Seasholtz and James E. Seasholtz
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 10, 1970No. 714-69, 715-69PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
The appellants, James E. Seasholtz and his wife Cheryl, were convicted on 11 counts of a 15-count indictment charging them with using the mails to defraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. 1 In substance, the indictment alleged that Seasholtz and Cheryl devised a scheme to defraud numerous companies engaged in writing health and accident insurance by making applications for insurance covering Cheryl and thereafter making claims to. each company for the same illness. It was further alleged that it was a part of the scheme when applications were submitted or claims for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Donald R. Elbel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- George Beck v. The United States of America, David R. Tuthill v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Roy E. Gusow v. United States of America, Melvin L. Shapiro v. United States of America, Donald H. Oransky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Donald Richard Munroe v. United States of America, Marian B. Munroe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. BrienCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Ronald Floyd WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Seymour Beitscher and James E. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Jack Lee Wolf, A/K/A Jack L. WolfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Sam De Stefano and Edward SpeiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.