Legal Opinion

International Shoe Company v. King

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 16, 1933No. 4-2811PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.

This suit was brought by appellant against appellee in the second division of the circuit court of Ouachita County to recover $1,784.99 for Red Goose shoes .sold and shipped to appellee by appellant.

The defense interposed to the action was that appellant breached its contract with appellee by allowing the business firm of West Brothers in Camden, Arkansas, to advertise the same line of shoes in violation of an agreement that appellant should sell no one else, nor permit any one else to advertise the line of shoes known as the Red Goose shoe in Camden except appellee, and that when appellant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. El Dorado Ice & Planing Mill Co. v. KinardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Weil v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Saulsbury Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  2. Swafford v. Sealtest Foods Division of National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Williams Mfg. Co. v. StrasbergSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. International Shoe Company v. WaldronSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API