Legal Opinion

Mitcham v. Kinschner

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 1996No. L-95-366Published

1Per curiam

Pursuant to 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 12(C), this case is placed on the accelerated docket. Appellant, Yvonne Mitcham, initiated litigation when Habitat for Humanity, Maumee Affiliate (“Habitat”), appellee, sold to a third party a property appellant had believed she would be able to purchase from Habitat.

Appellant became involved with Habitat in 1989 and subsequently completed the required number of volunteer hours to become a “partner family” in 1990, which meant she was eligible to purchase a house from Habitat. In 1991, Habitat assigned the property located at 1838 Ottawa Drive to appellant on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal & Haiman Co. v. First Union Management, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Woodford v. HarrellOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API