Legal Opinion
Micro-Assist, Inc. v. Cherry Communications, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 16, 1997No. 1:96-cv-06374PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
On December 31, 1996, plaintiff Micro-Assist, Inc. (“MAI”), a New Jersey corporation, brought this action against defendants Cherry Communications, Inc. (“Cherry”), Mercury Communications Service, Inc. (“Mercury”) and Tele-Pro, Inc. (“TPI”), incorporated in Illinois, Texas and New York, respectively. Complaint ¶¶4-7. The complaint appears to allege, among other things, that defendant Mercury breached a contract to install a new telephone system by failing properly to coordinate the installation with the other defendants. Mercury now moves for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- John Boutari and Son, Wines and Spirits, S.A. v. Attiki Importers and Distributors IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Outek Caribbean Distributors, Inc. v. Echo, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
- Pall Corp. v. PTI Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Mak Marketing, Inc. v. KalaposDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Copterline Oy v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Rescuecom Corp. v. ChumleyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.