Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Insurance v. Ruch
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided April 17, 2013No. Civil Action No. 3:12cv877PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before this Court on Defendants John S. Ruch (“Ruch”) and Westover Bon Air Insurance, LLC’s (“Westover”) (collectively, “Defendants”) MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. 20), the Amended Complaint filed against them by The Cincinnati Insurance Company (“Cincinnati”), the assignee of Hylton Hall Properties, LLC (“Hylton Hall”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be denied.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Hylton Hall owned property located at 700 Lanier Avenue in Danville, Virginia *340(the “Property”). Am. Compl. ¶9, ECF No. 19. The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Filak v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
- Richmond Metropolitan Authority v. McDevitt Street Bovis, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Sensenbrenner v. Rust, Orling & Neale, Architects, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gordon Jason et al. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and Unnamed Affiliates & Associates 1-100District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
- Reynolds v. USAA Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
- Sharon Academy v. Wieczorek Insurance, Inc.Vermont Superior Court · 2013