Legal Opinion

Morgan v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 22, 1985No. 82-1273PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EMBRY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiffs Robert E. Morgan (Morgan), Edwin M. Speed (Speed), and their professional association (the “Association”) sued South Central Bell (Bell) and L.M. Berry & Company (Berry) to recover damages they claim were incurred as a result of the omission of Morgan’s name from the Yellow Pages of the 1978 and 1979 Birmingham telephone directories and the 1980 Bessemer directory. After a jury verdict in the amount of $57,-000 in favor of plaintiffs, the trial court granted defendants’ motion for judgment non obstante…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Wille v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Lloyd v. Service Corp. of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. C & C PRODUCTS, INC. v. Premier Industrial Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Holley Equipment Company, a Corporation v. Credit Alliance Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  2. GREEN TREE ACCEPTANCE v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. HealthAmerica v. MentonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Birmingham News Co. v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API