Legal Opinion
Carr v. Haynes
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 26, 1977No. 10498PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge, Retired:
After a marriage of approximately eleven years, the parties to this appeal, hereafter referred to as husband and wife, separated in the spring of 1973 and were divorced in December of that year in the state of Nevada. After the separation but before the divorce, they entered into a separation agreement that purported to settle all rights and obligations between them, including the support and custody of their three children, all then of school age.
Approximately a year after the execution of the separation agreement this action was brought by the wife to recover from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Naomi E. Jackson v. Franklin B. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Jerome S. Murray v. Irving S. LichtmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Dixon v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Paine v. PaineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Tonn v. Philco CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stamenich v. MarkovicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Martin v. TateDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Haynes v. CarrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Antwayne Eric Ford v. Rita CastilloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Smith v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.