Legal Opinion

United States v. Jimenez

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 31, 2007No. 06-2044PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Circuit Judge.

Jose Jimenez was convicted of misappropriating the identities of two people long dead. He raises two challenges, one relating to all the charges and the other only to the two counts of aggravated identity theft. First, Jimenez argues that certain evidence admitted at trial should have been excluded for want of relevance or because it was unduly prejudicial. Second, he claims that “person” in the statute defining aggravated identity theft refers only to the living. In the alternative, he argues that the statute is sufficiently ambiguous to require reversal under the rule…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. United States v. Ramos-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. DwinellsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. GodinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. KowalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API