Legal Opinion

In Re Kenval Marketing Corp.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 1984No. 19-11668PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:

The threshold question raised in the case at bench is whether an assignee for the benefit of the debtor’s creditors has standing to object to the filing of an involuntary petition in bankruptcy against the debtor. If we find that he has, we must then decide whether the interests of the debtor and the creditors would be better served by our abstention. For the reasons stated herein, while we conclude that the assignee has the requisite standing, we will enter an order for relief against the debtor and will not abstain.

The facts of this case are as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goldberger v. Davis Jay Corregated Box Corp. (In Re Mercon Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. In Re Kreidler Import Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Kenval Marketing Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Zimmerman v. Frem Corp. (In Re Kenval Marketing Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. In Re Runaway II, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1994
  4. In Re Kenval Marketing Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. PCC Rokita S.A. v. HH Technology Corp.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API