Legal Opinion
In Re Kenval Marketing Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 15, 1988No. 91-20456PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRUCE I. FOX, Bankruptcy Judge:
After a tortuous procedural history (set out in an unpublished memorandum dated April 22,1987), the merits of an application filed by the law firm of Fox, Rothschild, O’Brien and Frankel are now before me. In this application, Fox, Rothschild seeks the allowance of professional fees of $17,-107.50 and the reimbursement of costs totaling $1,130.81 in connection with services rendered to the assignee for the benefit of creditors who was appointed, prepetition, under state law. These fees and costs are related to postpetition services rendered to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Randolph v. ScruggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- In Re Jensen-Farley Pictures, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
- Great Pacific Money Markets, Inc. v. Krueger (In Re Krueger)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Washington Lane AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Matter of Hearth & Hinge, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Hanson Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- Szwak v. Earwood (In Re Bodenheimer, Jones, Szwak, & Winchell L.L.P.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- In Re 245 Associates, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- In Re Snergy Properties, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Redmond v. NCMIC Finance Corp. (In re Brooke Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.