Clevenger v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentSmith, Chief Justice
I am unable to agree with the majority opinion. I entertain the view that the Industrial Accident Board’s order denying to claimant the medical and kindred compensation benefits which he seeks in this proceeding is correct and should be affirmed. I shall briefly delineate my reasons therefor.
The facts, set forth in the majority opinion need not be repeated here.
The issue, simply stated, is whether I.C. § 72-608 limits the time within which a claimant may pursue the right to seek benefits, — previously denied, — provided by I.C. § 72-307 (medical and kindred services).
The majority opinion…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Joyce v. Murphy Land & Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Gifford v. NottinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Wanke v. Ziebarth Const. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Flock v. J. C. Palumbo Fruit Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Bower v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.