Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clevenger v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1963No. 9123Published

1DissentSmith, Chief Justice

I am unable to agree with the majority opinion. I entertain the view that the Industrial Accident Board’s order denying to claimant the medical and kindred compensation benefits which he seeks in this proceeding is correct and should be affirmed. I shall briefly delineate my reasons therefor.

The facts, set forth in the majority opinion need not be repeated here.

The issue, simply stated, is whether I.C. § 72-608 limits the time within which a claimant may pursue the right to seek benefits, — previously denied, — provided by I.C. § 72-307 (medical and kindred services).

The majority opinion…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Joyce v. Murphy Land & Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Gifford v. NottinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Wanke v. Ziebarth Const. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Flock v. J. C. Palumbo Fruit Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Bower v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API