Rose v. Winn
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from McLennan. Tried below before the Hon.. L. G. Alexander. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Gould, Associate Justice.
Rose, the holder of an allowed and established claim against the estate of John A. Winn, deceased, on which claim the administrator of said estate had been regularly ordered by the court to pay over to him a balance in his hands, sought to enforce said payment by suit on the bond of the administrator. The instrument sued on as such bond is as follows:
Know all men by these presents: That we, J. W. England, as principal, and Mrs. Sallie L. Winn, Fauntly Johnson, G. B. Dutton, and Thomas Stanford, as sureties, are held and firmly bound unto D. F. Davis, clerk of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Houston & Great Northern Railroad v. RandallTexas Supreme Court · 1878
- Mitchell v. DuncanSupreme Court of Florida · 1857
- Janes v. Adm'rs of ReynoldsTexas Supreme Court · 1847
- Janes v. LanghamTexas Supreme Court · 1867
- Jones v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1863
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HansenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Ryndak v. SeawellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Federal Discount Co. v. ClowdusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Sacra v. HudsonTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Embry v. Midland Land Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.