Legal Opinion

Blakeslee v. Peabody

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1914No. Docket No. 85PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Ottawa; Cross, J. Assumpsit by Chauncey M. Blakeslee against Frederick F. Peabody for broker’s commissions. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, C. J.

This suit was brought by plaintiff against defendant in assumpsit to recover a certain commission under an agreement made with defendant to furnish him a purchaser ready, willing, and able to purchase certain premises located in the township of Spring Lake, Ottawa couhty, Mich., at a price and upon terms fixed by defendant. The result of the • trial was a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff for the amount claimed. Defendant, upon a writ of error, asks for a reversal.

There is little or no dispute between the parties upon the material facts in the case. The property in question was part…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Mercantile Corp. v. SpielbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  2. McOmber v. CampionMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Advance Realty Co. v. SpanosMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Holmes Realty Co. v. SilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Morgan v. ZangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API