Legal Opinion
City of Miami v. Burnett
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 24, 1992No. 91-784PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
596 So.2d 478 (1992)
CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant,
v.
Lucious E. BURNETT, Appellee.
No. 91-784.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 24, 1992.
Rehearing Denied April 28, 1992.
Jorge J. Fernandez, City Atty., and Ramon Irizarri and Kathryn S. Pecko, Asst. City Attys., Miami, for appellant.
Mark L. Zientz of Williams & Zientz, and Richard A. Sicking of Richard A. Sicking, P.A., Miami, for appellee.
BARFIELD, Judge.
The issue presented in this appeal is the retroactive application of Barragan v. City of Miami, 545 So.2d 252 (Fla. 1989), to the claim of an employee injured after June 30,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barragan v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Lehigh Corp. v. ByrdDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- City of Daytona Beach v. AmselDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Ship Shape v. TaylorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- City of Miami v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of Miami v. BellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Buitrago v. Landry'sDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- City of Miami v. ArosteguiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- City of Miami v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- City of North Bay Village v. CookDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.