City of Miami v. Thomas
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
This is another case involving the City of Miami’s pension offset ordinance. The City has raised two issues on appeal. The City argues that Barragan v. City of Miami, 545 So.2d 252 (Fla.1989) should not be applied retroactively. We have previously decided that it does apply retroactively. City of Miami v. Bell, 606 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); City of Miami v. Burnett, 596 So.2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA1992); City of Daytona Beach v. Amsel, 585 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 1st DCA1991). We see no reason to depart from those holdings.
The City also argues that it was error to award a ten percent penalty under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barragan v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- City of Daytona Beach v. AmselDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- City of Miami v. BurnettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- City of Miami v. BellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- City of Miami v. HickeyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992