Legal Opinion
United States v. Jones
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 7, 1995No. Civil Action 92-1563 (SSB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge:
Presently before the court are defendant Harry C. Jones’ three motions to dismiss. For the reasons' set forth below, defendant’s motions are granted in part and denied in part.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
On April 6, 1992, the United States filed a complaint in this court seeking to recover a judgment on certain federal tax assessments made against the defendant Harry C. Jones (“Jones”), to set aside a transfer of certain property by Jones to defendant Janet E. Jones (“Janet Jones”) as a fraudulent conveyance, and an adjudication that Janet Jones pay the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ala, Inc. v. Ccair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miller v. Virgin Islands Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2005
- Bellemead Development Corp. v. New Jersey State Council of Carpenters Benefit FundsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Bellemead Dev. v. NJ COUNCIL, CARP. BEN. FUNDSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- KHAWAM v. NEW JERSEY LAWYERS FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025